Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v. DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

IPR2024-00517

Aylo Freesites requests Director Review after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR on DISH's multi‑bitrate streaming patent, arguing the Board misapplied General Plastic factors and ignored the merits of the Leaning reference.

Jurisdiction
US PTAB
Case Number
IPR2024-00517
Filing Date
30 January 2024
Status
ok

Related Cases

patentIPR2025-01380

Red Hat, Inc.vsCompetitive Access Systems, Inc.

Red Hat has filed a petition for inter partes review of U.S. Patent 9,350,649, asserting that all 23 claims are obvious over prior‑art bandwidth‑aggregation references such as Kotzin and Phatak. The petition seeks cancellation of the claims under 35 U.S.C. §103.

patentIPR2024-00801

Helena Laboratories CorporationvsSebia

Helena Laboratories Corporation petitioned the PTAB challenging numerous claims of Sebia's patent (No. 7887686) on grounds of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. §103. The petitioner argues that combining known techniques, such as using zwitterionic buffers with flow inhibitors in Capillary Electrophoresis, is predictable to a Person Having Ordinary Skill In The Art.

patentIPR2025-01307

Samsung Electronic Co. Ltd. et al.vsMaxell, LTD.

The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01307 involving Samsung Electronic Co. Ltd. and Maxell, LTD., finding the petitioner had a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.

patentIPR2025-00321

Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al.vsStratasys, Inc. et al.

The PTAB decided to institute the IPR petition challenging Patent No. 9,421,713 B2 based on grounds of anticipation and obviousness in additive manufacturing. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that Claim 1 is unpatentable as anticipated by prior art (Boyer).

patentIPR2024-00669

NEURENT MEDICAL INC. et al.vsThe Foundry, LLC et al.

The Petitioner successfully demonstrated that multiple claims of the '077 patent were unpatentable over various combinations of prior art references. The Board found that a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art (POSA) would have been motivated to combine existing RF ablation and nasal treatment technologies.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call