Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al. v. XtreamEdge, Inc. et al.

WHOOP, Inc.vsOmni MedSci, Inc.

WHOOP petitions to invalidate claim 7 of Omni MedSci’s ’790 wearable sensor patent, asserting obviousness over multiple prior‑art references and indefiniteness under §112.

Geneoscopy, Inc.vsExact Sciences Corporation

The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision finding all challenged claims unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Petitioner successfully argued that the claimed colorectal cancer screening method was obvious when combining various prior art references, including Lenhard, Vilkin, Itzkowitz, and Kanaoka.

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al.vsTelcom Ventures LLC

Samsung Electronics has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate Telcom Ventures’ ’756 patent covering smartphone‑based mobile payments. The challenger relies on the Jain and Dua prior‑art references to argue obviousness of all 18 claims.

Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al.vsStellar, LLC

The PTAB notified the parties that the patent owner filed Director Review requests for IPR2024-01284, 01285, 01313, and 01314. Motorola Solutions, the petitioner, may file a concise response within five business days, limited to the issues raised.

HighLevel, Inc.vsEtison LLC d/b/a ClickFunnels

ClickFunnels (Etison LLC) opposes HighLevel’s request for a Director Review of the PTAB’s institution decision, citing the Hulu precedent and the fact that the claims have already been invalidated in district court. The response stresses efficiency and the Board’s discretion to deny institution.