Comcast Cable Communications, LLC et al. v. Entropic Communications, LLC

Fluidmaster, Inc.vsDanco, Inc. et al.

The PTAB found several independent claims unpatentable over prior art references (Brown and Ho) using grounds of obviousness. The Board adopted a broad construction for 'integrally molded with' as 'molded together as a single structure.'

Google LLCvsSecure Communication Technologies, LLC

Google’s IPR against Secure Communication Technologies’ 8,385,896 patent resulted in all challenged claims being found unpatentable for obviousness over Perttila, Emmons, and Insolia.

i4F Licensing NVvsVILOX AB

i4F Licensing NV initiated an IPR challenging VILOX AB's patent (11421425) covering floor panel joining systems. The petitioner asserts that the claims are anticipated by Miller and rendered obvious over Miller alone or in view of Roy.

Alpinestars S.p.A et al.vsDainese S.p.A.

Alpinestars has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 22 claims of Dainese’s U.S. Patent 12,012,065, arguing that the claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art references. The petition also argues that discretionary denial is not warranted.

Deere & CompanyvsDavid’s Dozer V-Loc System, Inc. et al.

Deere & Company requested a Director Review of the USPTO’s denial to institute an IPR against David’s Dozer V‑Loc System’s patent. The Director denied the request, leaving the original denial in place.