Short Summary
Merck has filed a post‑grant review petition challenging U.S. Patent 12,297,278 covering broad tetravalent Wnt‑surrogate antibodies. The petition asserts lack of written description, enablement, indefiniteness, and anticipation by the Garcia publication.
Detailed Summary
In a petition for post‑grant review (PGR2026‑00027), Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC challenges U.S. Patent No. 12,297,278 owned by Surrozen Operating, Inc. The patent claims a genus of soluble, tetravalent, multispecific Wnt‑surrogate molecules defined solely by function. Merck contends that the specification fails to provide a representative number of species, lacks a common structural feature, and offers no guidance for the unpredictable Wnt signaling field, rendering the claims lacking written description, not enabled, and indefinite. Additionally, the petition alleges that claims 1 and 4 are anticipated by the Garcia publication (WO 2016/040895 A1). The Board has yet to decide whether to institute the review.
Practitioner Note
This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC vs Surrozen Operating, Inc. et al. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.
Related Cases
Aptiv Services US, LLC et al.vsMicrochip Technology, Inc.
Aptiv Services challenged Microchip Technology's LDO voltage regulator patent (9471074), arguing that the claimed features are obvious over prior art. The petitioner relies heavily on combinations of references like Al-Shyoukh, Rincon-Mora, Ivanov, and Stanescu to demonstrate lack of inventive step.
Liberty Energy Services LLC et al.vsU.S. WELL SERVICES, LLC et al.
Liberty Energy has petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against U.S. Well Services' ’801 patent covering a mobile hydraulic fracturing power system. The petition asserts that all 20 claims are obvious over combinations of existing power‑distribution references and seeks cancellation of the claims.
Apple Inc.vsHBCU Messaging US LP
Apple has filed an IPR petition challenging all 30 claims of the ’183 Patent covering undelivered‑message thresholds. The petition asserts that a combination of four prior‑art references makes the claims obvious under § 103. No institution decision has been made yet.
Generac Power Systems, Inc.vsPSLC LLC
Generac Power Systems has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate 27 claims of U.S. Patent 11,967,857 covering backup‑power load control. The petition relies on obviousness over a combination of four prior‑art references and defines key terms to support its position.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsXiFi Networks R&D, Inc.
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01207 after the petitioner met the likelihood of prevailing standard, but all related proceedings are currently stayed pending Director Review.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.
Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.