GE Healthcare Ltd. et al. v. The Johns Hopkins University et al.

i4F Licensing NVvsVILOX AB

The PTAB denied the IPR petition filed by i4F Licensing NV against VILOX AB's patent, finding that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient support for anticipation or obviousness over prior art references Miller and Roy. The Board specifically found insufficient evidence regarding a curved horizontal locking surface disclosed in Miller.

Koki Holdings America Ltd. et al.vsKyocera Senco Industrial Tools, Inc.

Koki Holdings America Ltd. and Kyocera Senco Industrial Tools, Inc. entered into a settlement agreement covering U.S. Patent No. 11,034,007 and jointly moved to terminate IPR2025-00261. The Board was asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. §317(a).

Google LLCvsProxense, LLC

Google and Proxense have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,679,289 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion stresses settlement, early‑stage status, and judicial economy.

Activision Blizzard, Inc.vsMilestone Entertainment, LLC

Milestone Entertainment’s preliminary response argues that Activision Blizzard’s IPR petition fails to show that the cited references disclose the patented dynamic game‑parameter system or provide a motivation to combine them, leading to a request for denial of institution.

Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company et al.vsMES, Inc.

The Director reviewed multiple IPRs challenging several patents and issued an Order supplementing a prior remand. The key issue addressed is the permissibility of multiple petitions challenging the same patent.