Apple Inc. v. TopWire, LLC

IPR2026-00303

Apple has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all nine claims of TopWire’s ’202 Patent covering a spacer‑connector package‑on‑package structure, alleging obviousness over Chen, Sun, Wu and Furuta references.

Jurisdiction
US PTAB
Case Number
IPR2026-00303
Decision Date
16 March 2026
Filing Date
16 March 2026

Detailed Summary

In a petition for inter partes review, Apple Inc. challenges U.S. Patent No. 9,859,202 owned by TopWire, LLC, asserting that claims 1‑9 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §103. The petition sets forth four grounds, each pairing the Chen publication with Sun, Wu, and/or Furuta references to show that the claimed spacer‑connector architecture would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill. Detailed claim‑by‑claim mappings are provided, and Apple requests that the Board institute the review and cancel the challenged claims. The filing references several Federal Circuit decisions on claim construction and obviousness, and notes an underlying district‑court infringement suit between the parties.

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in Apple Inc. vs TopWire, LLC is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

patentIPR2025-01385

Volex plcvsCREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD.

Volex plc and Credo Technology Group settled their IPR disputes covering three patents, filing a joint motion that led the PTAB to terminate the proceedings before a trial was instituted.

patentIPR2025-00837

Cisco Systems, Inc.vsQPRIVACY USA LLC

The USPTO denied Cisco’s request for rehearing of the Director’s discretionary denial and institution denial in two IPRs involving QPRIVACY USA’s patent 11,106,824. The order upholds the earlier decisions.

patentIPR2025-00392

LG Electronics, Inc. et al.vsMaxell, LTD.

LG Electronics and Maxell have reached a settlement and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 8,339,493, a camera‑technology patent. The motion cites statutory authority and public‑policy benefits of settlement.

patentIPR2024-00978

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsCerence Operating Company et al.

Samsung Electronics, Google LLC and Cerence Operating Company have reached a settlement over U.S. Patent 7,395,078, a speech‑recognition technology. Consequently, they filed a joint motion to terminate the IPR, citing the settlement and early stage of the proceeding.

patentIPR2025-00530

Axon Enterprise, Inc. et al.vsAirspace Systems, Inc.

Axon and Dedrone have filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of nine claims of Airspace Systems' UAV‑defense patent, arguing obviousness over four prior‑art references. The petition also argues that institution is proper under the Fintiv factors.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call