LG Electronics, Inc. et al. v. Maxell, Ltd.

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al.vsMobile Data Technologies LLC

The Director denied Samsung’s request for review of the Board’s decision not to institute an IPR against Mobile Data Technologies’ patent 9,619,578, leaving the institution denial in place.

Microsoft CorporationvsProxense, LLC

Microsoft Corporation successfully convinced the PTAB that its biometric authentication claims were not obvious over prior art, leading to the institution of the IPR. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim, allowing the case to proceed to trial.

iRhythm, Inc.vsWelch Allyn, Inc. et al.

The Director denied iRhythm's request for review of the institution decision in IPR2025-00374, leaving the denial of institution in place.

Ecto World, LLC d/b/a Demand Vape et al.vsRAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. et al.

The PTAB denied institution for the IPR challenge against RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc., citing efficiency concerns. The Board found that despite arguments regarding material error and prior art relevance, denying institution served the integrity of the system given the parallel ITC investigation.

Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company et al.vsMES, Inc.

The PTAB terminated the IPR against WEC Energy Group after the parties settled, but the case remains open for Berkshire Hathaway Energy, MidAmerican Energy and PacifiCorp. The settlement agreement is treated as business‑confidential information.