Globus Medical, Inc. v. Spinelogik, Inc.

IPR2025-00226

Globus Medical has filed a petition for inter partes review of Spinelogik’s U.S. Patent 8,460,385 covering a spinal fusion device. The challenger asserts that the claims are obvious over prior‑art implants (Moskowitz, Hess) and a combination with Steffee’s curved fasteners, and seeks cancellation of claims 1‑5, 7 and 9.

Jurisdiction
US PTAB
Case Number
IPR2025-00226
Filing Date
21 November 2024
Status
ok

Related Cases

patentIPR2025-00242

Precision Cancer Technologies Inc.vsOncoustics Inc.

Precision Cancer Technologies seeks a Director Review after the PTAB denied institution of an IPR on its AI‑driven ultrasound patent. The petitioner claims the Board erred factually and legally by demanding proof beyond the expert testimony that the prior art discloses a single‑frame ultrasound data set.

patentIPR2025-00218

Tesla, Inc.vsIntellectual Ventures II

The PTAB denied Tesla's request for Director Review of the decision that denied institution of IPR2025-00218, leaving the original denial in place.

patentIPR2024-00940

Aylo Freesites Ltd et al.vsDISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

The PTAB found that claims 1-11 of the patent were unpatentable over prior art references (Leaning, Klemets, Gamble) based on obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Board adopted a limiting construction for 'to achieve continuous presentation,' requiring uninterrupted playback across quality shifts.

patentIPR2025-01041

Amazon.com, Inc. et al.vsAudio Pod IP, LLC

The PTAB denied Amazon’s request for Director Review, upholding the Deputy Director’s discretionary denial of institution for Audio Pod’s audio‑technology patent. The Board found Amazon’s APA and due‑process arguments unpersuasive.

patentIPR2025-01224

TikTok Inc. and Bytedance Ltd, Bytedance Pte. Ltd., Bytedance Inc., TikTok Ltd., and Heliophilia Pte. Ltd.vsDiStefano Website Innovations, LLC

TikTok has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 29 claims of DiStefano’s reissued ’971 patent, asserting that the claims are obvious over prior art such as Block, Arnold, and Arora. The petition includes a detailed claim construction for “reciprocal site.”

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call