ClearCorrect Operating, LLC et al. v. Align Technology, Inc.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al.vsSinotechnix LLC

Samsung has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of six claims of the ’626 LED patent, arguing that the claims are anticipated or obvious over five prior‑art references. The petition also argues that discretionary factors favor institution.

Micron Technology, Inc. et al.vsYangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.

Micron Technology seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s decision that claim 4 of its 3‑D NAND patent remains unpatentable. The petition argues the Board misapplied obviousness law, ignoring KSR precedent and the known‑substitute teaching of Kim and Tessariol.

LEDUP MANUFACTURING GROUP LTD.vsSeasonal Specialties, LLC

The Petitioner successfully demonstrated anticipation and obviousness for the majority of claims (1, 2, 4–7, 9–14) related to a resistor bypass circuit for LEDs. The Board found that prior art references disclosed all limitations or provided clear motivation for substitution in multiple instances.

The Integration Group of Americas, Inc.vsSitePro, Inc.

The Integration Group and SitePro settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,726,504 B2 before the IPR was instituted, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding.

Microsoft CorporationvsProxense, LLC

The PTAB denied Apple’s request for Director Review of the Final Written Decision in IPR2024-00233 concerning Patent 8,886,954. The Board found no merit to overturn the prior ruling.