Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Yealink Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. Barco N.V.

American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. et al.vsNeapco Components, LLC

American Axle and Neapco Components settled their dispute and jointly moved to terminate IPR2025-00091 covering a drivetrain patent.

Kangxi Communications TechnologiesvsSkyworks Solutions Canada, Inc. et al.

Kangxi Communications has filed an IPR petition against Skyworks’ 7,409,200 patent covering multi‑die RF front‑end modules. The challenger alleges obviousness over Garlepp and over a Magoon‑Ngompe combination. The petition seeks institution of the IPR and cancellation of the claims.

Apple Inc.vsImberaTek, LLC

Apple and ImberaTek settled their disputes, leading the PTAB to terminate a series of inter partes review proceedings before any institution decision was made.

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al.vsMaxell, LTD.

Samsung Electronics filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of claims 1‑4 of Maxell’s U.S. Patent 11,277,650. The petition argues the claims are obvious over three prior‑art references—Shindo, Sasaki, and a combination of Futa and McClellan—under 35 U.S.C. §103. The petition requests that all challenged claims be found unpatentable.

Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company et al.vsMES, Inc.

Berkshire Hathaway Energy and affiliates seek PTAB Director review to block an IPR on their mercury‑control patent, arguing the Board’s institution is inefficient and its privity analysis is legally flawed.