Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. KIWI Intellectual Assets Corporation

Visa, Inc.vsCortex MCP, Inc.

Visa challenges Cortex MCP's patent on digital credential verification, arguing the claims are obvious over prior art. The petitioner asserts that tokenization and electronic credential management methods were well-known in the field of information security. This IPR petition sets up a major dispute over the novelty of modern authentication systems.

Pascal TechnologiesvsCambridge Enterprise Limited et al.

Cambridge Enterprise has requested a Director Review of IPR2024-01235. Pascal Technologies may respond within five business days, limited to five pages and without new evidence. The Board will decide whether to grant the review.

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al.vsMaxell, Ltd.

Maxell seeks director review of a PTAB final written decision that found all challenged claims of its fingerprint‑registration patent unpatentable. The patent owner argues the Board’s claim construction and obviousness analysis are erroneous and that the IPR should never have been instituted under §325(d).

Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al.vsRavenWhite Security, Inc.

Home Depot petitions the PTAB to invalidate all ten claims of RavenWhite’s ’823 patent, asserting obviousness over Hinton and Varghese prior art and arguing that discretionary denial is unwarranted.

ELMOS SEMICONDUCTOR SEvsTexas Instruments Incorporated

Elmos Semiconductor SE challenged Texas Instruments' LED driver patent (11653432) in the PTAB, alleging obviousness and anticipation. The petitioner relies on a combination of multiple prior art references to invalidate claims 1-20 related to power management ICs.