Aerin Medical Inc. v. Neurent Medical Ltd. et al.

Kia America, Inc. et al.vsEmerging Automotive LLC

Kia and Toyota have filed a PTAB post‑grant review petition challenging Emerging Automotive’s vehicle‑key sharing patent (US 12,337,715). Petitioners allege obviousness over four prior‑art references and assert lack of written description for key claim limitations. They seek institution and cancellation of claims 1‑24.

DataDome S.A. et al.vsArkose Labs Holdings, Inc.

DataDome has filed a petition to review Arkose Labs’ ‘robot proof website’ patent (U.S. 9,148,427), seeking to invalidate the claims through inter partes review.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsWilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc.

Samsung Electronics has filed a petition for inter partes review of U.S. Patent 12,004,262, asserting that its four claims are obvious over several IEEE 802.11 draft and standard documents, as well as the Yang publication. The petition seeks institution of the IPR and cancellation of all claims.

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al.vsMobile Data Technologies LLC

Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging Mobile Data Technologies’ 9,032,039 patent covering mobile content sharing. The petition argues the claims are obvious over two prior‑art combinations and urges the Board to institute the review.

Terumo BCT, Inc.vsHaemonetics Corporation

Terumo BCT has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 30 claims of Haemonetics’ plasma‑collection patent, arguing they are obvious over a suite of older apheresis technologies. The petition lists nine statutory grounds under 35 U.S.C. §103, each tied to specific prior‑art references.