Perplexity AI, Inc. v. Comet ML, Inc.

Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al.vsAmerican GNC Corporation

The Board issued a Final Written Decision finding that claims 1 and 3 of patent 6508122 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). The Petitioner successfully demonstrated obviousness by combining multiple prior art references, including Fujiyoshi, Kumar, Cox, and Townsend.

Apple Inc.vsImberaTek, LLC

Apple and ImberaTek settled their disputes, leading the PTAB to terminate a series of inter partes review proceedings before any institution decision was made.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsOptimum Imaging Technologies LLC

Samsung and Optimum Imaging Technologies settled four IPRs before trial. The parties filed joint motions to terminate, and the PTAB dismissed the petitions, treating the settlement agreements as confidential.

Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al.vsStratasys, Inc. et al.

Stratasys seeks Director Review to vacate the Referral and Institution of an IPR covering its 3D‑printing patent, arguing that parallel district‑court litigation and procedural errors warrant discretionary denial.

STARA S.A.-INDÚSTRIA DE IMPLEMENTOS AGRÍCOLASvsAGCO Corporation

STARA petitions the PTAB to institute an IPR against AGCO's 11,665,989 patent covering a farm implement contouring toolbar, asserting that the claims are obvious over several prior‑art references. The petition seeks cancellation of 15 claims.