Imperative Care, Inc. v. Inari Medical, Inc. et al.

Juniper Networks, IncvsMonarch Networking Solutions LLC

Juniper seeks to invalidate Monarch’s ’845 patent covering IPv4/IPv6 transition mechanisms, arguing the claims are obvious over Ananda, Wetterwald, and RFC4380 and requesting the PTAB to institute an IPR.

Clean Chemistry, Inc.vsEnviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc. et al.

Clean Chemistry has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 14 claims of Enviro Tech’s peracetic acid patent, arguing obviousness over Okano and combinations with Withenshaw and Oringer. The petition also asserts that the claims require steps to be performed in order.

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al.vsVB Assets, LLC

Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging all 52 claims of VB Assets’ voice‑advertising patent, arguing they are obvious over multiple prior‑art references. The petition cites §§102(b/e) and prior claim constructions to support unpatentability.

YANGTZE MEMORY TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, LTD.vsMicron Technology, Inc. et al.

Yangtze Memory Technologies (YMTC) filed an authorized response to Micron’s Director Review request, arguing the PTAB correctly upheld YMTC’s eligibility to pursue IPRs and rejected Micron’s Return Mail arguments. The Board is urged to deny Micron’s request for discretionary denial.

AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLCvsVB Assets, LLC

Amazon has filed an IPR petition challenging VB Assets’ ’249 patent covering multimodal natural‑language responses, seeking cancellation of all 28 claims on obviousness grounds.