Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v. Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.

GE Healthcare Ltd. et al.vsThe Johns Hopkins University et al.

GE Healthcare petitions to invalidate Johns Hopkins’s 11,938,201 patent covering FAP‑targeting radiopharmaceuticals, arguing that claims 1‑3 are obvious over US‑633, US‑121, Meletta and Jansen references.

Tempur Sealy International, Inc. et al.vsPurple Innovation, LLC

Tempur Sealy challenged Purple Innovation's '733 Patent, arguing that all 20 claims are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Board has instituted the IPR proceedings, finding a reasonable likelihood of success for the challenger on at least one claim.

DataDome S.A. et al.vsArkose Labs Holdings, Inc.

DataDome has filed a petition to review Arkose Labs’ ‘robot proof website’ patent (U.S. 9,148,427), seeking to invalidate the claims through inter partes review.

Kia America, Inc. et al.vsEmerging Automotive LLC

Kia and Toyota have filed a PTAB post‑grant review petition challenging Emerging Automotive’s vehicle‑key sharing patent (US 12,337,715). Petitioners allege obviousness over four prior‑art references and assert lack of written description for key claim limitations. They seek institution and cancellation of claims 1‑24.

Jeisys Medical Inc. et al.vsSerendia, LLC

Serendia and Jeisys Medical settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 9,320,536, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding.