CrowdStrike, Inc. et al. v. GoSecure, Inc.

fuboTV Media Inc.vsDISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

The USPTO denied fuboTV’s request for Director Review of the Final Written Decision in several IPRs, including the challenge to DISH’s patent 11,677,798.

Stingray Group Inc. et al.vsHernandez-Mondragon, Edwin et al.

Stingray Group’s petition challenges a late, unauthorized request by patent owner Edwin Hernandez-Mondragon to submit new evidence in IPR2025-00350. The petition argues the request should be denied for untimely filing and rule violations.

Micron Technology, Inc. et al.vsYangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.

The PTAB denied Micron Technology's IPR challenge against Yangtze Memory Technologies regarding NAND Flash patents, finding insufficient evidence to prove obviousness over the cited prior art (Seo and Choi).

Embody, Inc. et al.vsLifeNet Health

Embody and Zimmer Biomet have filed an IPR seeking cancellation of all 12 claims of LifeNet Health’s 2018 scaffold patent, arguing anticipation by earlier academic publications and obviousness. The petition emphasizes strong discretionary factors favoring institution.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsMullen Industries LLC

Samsung Electronics filed a reply opposing Mullen Industries’ request for Director Review of the PTAB’s institution of an IPR covering Samsung’s smartwatch patent. The petitioner argues that discretionary factors favor institution, citing lack of overlap and strong merits. Samsung seeks denial of the director’s review request.