Arashi Vision Inc. (d/b/a Insta360) v. GoPro, Inc.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsOura Health Oy et al.

The PTAB denied Samsung's Post-Grant Review petition against Ouraing because the patent owner had statutorily disclaimed all 16 challenged claims.

Amazon.com, Services LLCvsVB Assets, LLC

The USPTO Director denied the institution of an Inter Partes Review (IPR) petition filed by Amazon.com against VB Assets' patent 11087385.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsStaton Techiya, LLC

Samsung filed an Inter Partes Review petition challenging U.S. Patent No. 11,710,473 owned by Staton Techiya, LLC. The core argument asserts that the patent's claims related to ambient sound control are obvious based on combinations of various prior art references. This challenge is tied to ongoing district court litigation.

Comcast Corporation et al.vsEntropic Communications LLC

Comcast Cable Communications lost its IPR challenge against Entropic Communications, LLC regarding claims related to cable network service group management. The PTAB denied the petition, finding insufficient evidence that the claimed features were obvious in light of prior art references.

Arm Ltd.vsICPillar LLC

Arm Ltd. filed a Petition challenging claims in U.S. Patent No. 8,924,899 for obviousness over prior art references Rompaey and Banerjee. The petitioner argues that the claimed integrated circuit design methods are well-developed in the state of the art. This petition is currently instituted, setting the stage for a full trial on the merits.