Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC et al. v. Sung, Chien-Min

AT&T Corp et al.vsDaingean Technologies Ltd.

Daingean Technologies Ltd. opposes AT&T and co‑petitioners' IPR petition on U.S. Patent 11,134,400, arguing the cited reference is not prior art and fails to teach the claimed SRB configurations, urging the Board to deny institution.

LinkedIn CorporationvsIntent IQ, LLC

LinkedIn and patent holder Intent IQ (AlmondNet) reached a settlement that resolves all disputes over U.S. Patent 10,715,878, prompting a joint motion to terminate the pending IPR.

Ewald Dorken AGvsSchaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG et al.

The PTAB denied Ewald Dorken AG's IPR challenge against Schaeffler Technologies regarding wheel bearing coating patents. The Board found the petition failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing, citing insufficient mapping and lack of explicit disclosure for key limitations like 'zinc flake coating.'

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al.vsMaxell, Ltd.

Samsung Electronics challenged Maxell's patent covering multi-radio cellular functionality, simultaneous video/data transfer, and over-the-air updates. The petition argues these features were obvious combinations of prior art references like N93 and Dua. This IPR targets 27 claims across five distinct grounds.

Comcast Corporation et al.vsEntropic Communications LLC

Comcast Cable Communications challenged Entropic's patent (11381866) in an IPR, asserting that the claims are anticipated or obvious over various prior art references. The petitioner argues that Zhang anticipates key features and combinations of Zhang with Reisman, Jackson, and Pandey render other claims obvious. The Board has instituted the proceeding based on these compelling unpatentability challenges.