TikTok Inc. et al. v. Cellspin Soft, Inc.

Google LLC et al.vsEyesMatch Ltd.

Google LLC and other petitioners challenge U.S. Patent No. 8,982,109 by asserting obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petition relies on numerous grounds combining digital mirror systems with various prior art references related to image correction, efficiency, and distance calculation. This challenge targets core claims across the augmented reality/digital mirror technology space.

ADC Solutions Auto LLC et al.vsThe Noco Company

ADC Solutions Auto LLC challenges The Noco Company's patent covering jump start apparatus technology, asserting that key claims are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and § 103. The petitioner argues that the claimed USB charging features are obvious when combining prior art references like Richardson with Zhao or Yu with Paparrizos.

Texas Instruments IncorporatedvsParkerVision, Inc.

RPX's petition to invalidate ParkerVision's down-conversion patent was denied by the PTAB, which found no reasonable likelihood of success on the asserted anticipation and obviousness grounds.

TikTok Inc. et al.vsNTECH Properties, Inc.

The USPTO denied TikTok's request for Director Review of the institution decisions in two IPRs involving NTECH's patents, leaving the institution denials in place.

BOE Technology Group Co., LTDvsOptronic Sciences LLC

The Board found all seven challenged claims unpatentable, rejecting the patent owner's narrow construction of 'passivation layer.' The petitioner successfully demonstrated that combining prior art references (Anzai and Yamazaki) taught or rendered obvious the claimed invention in OLED devices.