Short Summary
The PTAB denied fuboTV’s request for Director Review of the Final Written Decision in IPR2024-00902 and related IPRs, leaving the original decisions intact.
Detailed Summary
In an order dated August 28, 2025, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board denied the petitions filed by fuboTV Media Inc. for Director Review of the Final Written Decisions in multiple inter partes review proceedings, including IPR2024-00902 concerning U.S. Patent No. 11,470,138 owned by DISH Technologies L.L.C. The Board concluded that the requests did not meet the statutory standards for review, thereby upholding the original decisions and closing the avenue for further administrative challenge in these cases.
Practitioner Note
This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in fuboTV Media Inc. vs DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.
Related Cases
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsAdvanced Coding Technologies, LLC
Samsung Electronics challenges U.S. Patent No. 8,090,025 regarding video coding and error concealment techniques via an IPR Petition. The petitioner asserts that all ten claims are obvious over combinations of prior art references including Mualla, Shirani, and Saito.
NXP USA, INC. et al.vsRedstone Logics LLC
NXP and Qualcomm have filed an IPR petition challenging Redstone Logics' 8,549,339 patent covering multi‑core processors with independent voltage and clock domains, seeking cancellation of ten claims on obviousness grounds.
Webgroup Czech Republic, a.s. et al.vsDISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
The USPTO denied Webgroup Czech Republic's request for Director Review of the Final Written Decisions in two IPRs challenging DISH Technologies patents.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsFour Batons Wireless, LLC
Samsung has filed a request for Director Review challenging the PTAB’s denial of institution for its IPR against Four Batons Wireless’s 8,073,436 patent, alleging due‑process and APA violations and improper use of discretionary denial factors.
Phison Electronics CorporationvsVervain, LLC
The PTAB denied Phison’s petition to institute a post‑grant review of Vervain’s NAND‑flash storage patent, finding the challenger failed to show any claim was likely unpatentable.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.
Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.