Apple Inc. v. ImberaTek, LLC

Apple Inc.vsCarbyne Biometrics, LLC

Apple Inc. filed a Petition challenging Carbyne Biometrics' patent (9,972,010), arguing the claims are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Board has instituted the case, finding a reasonable likelihood that the challenged claims are unpatentable.

BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.vsSamsung Display Co., Ltd.

The PTAB issued a final written decision in IPR2023‑01075, finding that none of the 24 challenged claims of Samsung Display’s OLED pixel‑arrangement patent (U.S. 11,594,578) were unpatentable. The Board rejected BOE’s obviousness arguments based on Matthies, Yamada, and Hong, concluding no teaching of a "pixel defining layer" existed. All claims remain in force.

Hulu LLC et al.vs--

Hulu and Capital One settled their IPR dispute with patent owner Implicit, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding before trial. The Board granted motions to keep the settlement agreements confidential.

Aylo Freesites Ltd et al.vsDISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

The Director vacated the Final Written Decision and dismissed the IPR petition filed by Aylo Freesites Ltd against DISH Technologies L.L.C., finding that the petition was time-barred after correcting its list of Real Parties in Interest.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsWilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc.

The USPTO denied Samsung’s request for Director Review of the institution decision in IPR2025-01069, leaving the institution of the Wilus patent intact.