Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company et al. v. MES, Inc.

Google LLCvsSecure Communication Technologies, LLC

Google’s IPR petition challenging nine claims of the ’749 patent was denied. The Board concluded the petition lacked sufficient particularity and did not demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on anticipation or obviousness grounds.

Texas Instruments IncorporatedvsParkerVision, Inc.

Texas Instruments (TI) successfully secured the institution of its IPR against ParkerVision, Inc., establishing a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds. The Board found that TI's evidence was sufficient at this stage to overcome arguments regarding inherency and simulation data reliability.

SAP America, Inc.vsISIX IP LLC

The PTAB decided to institute the IPR against ISIX IP LLC's patent (6308178), finding sufficient evidence that SAP America, Inc. had a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds over prior art references like Brann and Suresh. The Board adopted key claim constructions, notably rejecting the Patent Owner's narrow view of 'application.'

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsFour Batons Wireless, LLC

Samsung has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of 18 claims of Four Batons Wireless’s ’436 patent, alleging obviousness over a combination of prior‑art network‑selection references. The petition argues that discretionary factors favor institution.

Bitsgap Holding OU et al.vsIntercurrency Software LLC

Bitsgap and co‑owners have petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against Intercurrency Software’s 2018 patent covering cross‑border currency conversion in trading platforms, arguing the claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art systems.