US Conec Ltd. v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsWilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc.

The USPTO denied Samsung’s request for Director Review of the institution decision in IPR2025-01043, leaving the patent owner’s claims intact.

Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al.vsSecurity Technology, LLC

Home Depot filed a response to the patent owner’s request for Director Review, arguing that all Fintiv factors support instituting the IPR and contesting the owner’s claim‑construction positions. The petitioner also pledged not to raise §103 defenses in the parallel district‑court case.

Target CorporationvsHEADWATER RESEARCH LLC

The PTAB held that all of the challenged claims of Headwater’s ’541 patent are unpatentable, finding anticipation or obviousness over the Rao reference and, for many claims, additional references.

Foleon Inc. et al.vsTURTL SURF & IMMERSE LIMITED

Foleon seeks a Director review to compel entry of adverse judgment after Turtl Surf disclaimed all challenged claims of its interactive‑document patent. The petitioner argues the Board erred in denying a motion for adverse judgment, citing precedent where such judgments were entered pre‑institution.

Orca Security Ltd.vsWiz, Inc.

Orca Security has filed a petition for IPR against Wiz’s AI‑cloud security patent, contending that the claims are obvious over existing cloud‑scanning (Shua) and AI‑analysis (Lang) references.