Short Summary
IBM and Croga Innovations settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,601,780 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review, citing statutory authority under 35 U.S.C. §317.
Detailed Summary
In IPR2025-00380 concerning U.S. Patent 10,601,780, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and patent owner Croga Innovations Ltd. reached a settlement of all disputes, including the pending infringement lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas. The parties filed a Joint Motion to Terminate the inter partes review, invoking 35 U.S.C. §317(a) and related regulations, and requested that the settlement agreement be treated as business‑confidential information. The Board was asked to terminate the proceeding because no merits decision had been made, and the parties argued that termination aligns with public policy favoring settlement and resource efficiency.
Practitioner Note
This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in International Business Machines Corporation vs Croga Innovations Ltd. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.
Related Cases
Meta Platforms, Inc.vsSitNet, LLC
The PTAB denied the institution of IPR2026-00101 against SitNet's patent 12245325. The denial was based on Meta Platforms failing to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
Dr. Squatch, LLCvsThe Procter & Gamble Company
Dr. Squatch argues that the PTAB correctly rejected P&G’s attempts to reinterpret claim language and that the challenged deodorant stick claims are obvious over prior art. The petition also rebuts P&G’s RPI argument, maintaining that Dr. Squatch was the sole real party in interest.
PacifiCorp et al.vsMES, Inc.
MidAmerican Energy Company and BirchTech Corp. have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,926,218 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review, citing statutory requirements and public‑policy benefits of settlement.
Foleon Inc. et al.vsTURTL SURF & IMMERSE LIMITED
Foleon’s request for Director review to impose an adverse judgment on Turtl Surf & Immerse was denied. The Patent Owner argued procedural impropriety and reliance on established PTAB precedent rejecting adverse judgments after a disclaimer.
Resonac Hard Disk Corporation et al.vsMR TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
Exhibit 1042 presents aggregate PTAB IPR statistics for hard‑disk patents, noting a 100% institution rate across 4,148 trials. Twenty percent of those trials produced mixed claim findings, while the majority favored the petitioner.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.
Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.