Short Summary
Apple and Apex Beam have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,374,721 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review, citing statutory requirements and public‑policy benefits of settlement.
Detailed Summary
In IPR2025-00901, Apple Inc. and Apex Beam Technologies LLC jointly filed a motion to terminate the inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 11,374,721, which covers a method and device for wireless communication. The parties submitted a confidential settlement agreement and release, asserting that they have satisfied the statutory conditions of a joint request under 35 U.S.C. §317(a) and (b) before any merits decision. Emphasizing cost savings and public‑policy support for settlements, they asked the Board to end the proceeding. The Board is expected to grant the termination, effectively concluding the dispute.
Practitioner Note
This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in Apple Inc. vs Apex Beam Technologies LLC is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.
Related Cases
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY et al.vsMES, Inc.
Court decision.
Google LLCvsDH International Ltd.
Google LLC's IPR challenge against DH International Ltd.'s payment card patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that Google failed to establish a reasonable likelihood of prevailing, specifically regarding the obviousness claims over Ong and Hoff.
Ford Motor CompanyvsAutoConnect Holdings LLC
Ford Motor Company has filed a petition to institute an IPR against AutoConnect’s U.S. Patent 9,290,153 covering vehicle‑device discovery and personalization. The petition asserts that all 21 claims are obvious over prior art such as Moinzadeh, Clement, Rasin, Bosch, and Ghabra.
Aesthetic Management Partners, LLC et al.vsHydraFacial LLC
Aesthetic Management Partners has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 20 claims of HydraFacial’s ’477 skin‑treatment patent. The petition relies on obviousness grounds under §103, citing multiple prior‑art references covering microdermabrasion and fluid delivery systems.
Microsoft CorporationvsDialect, LLC
Microsoft and Dialect have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,917,367, filing a joint motion to terminate the inter partes review before the Board makes an institution decision.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.
Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.