Ericsson Inc. et al. v. Active Wireless Technologies LLC

IPR2024-00951

Ericsson, Nokia and Active Wireless Technologies have settled their 5G NR patent dispute and jointly moved to terminate the IPR. The Board has not yet decided the merits, and public policy supports termination.

Jurisdiction
US PTAB
Case Number
IPR2024-00951
Decision Date
31 May 2024
Filing Date
31 May 2024

Detailed Summary

In IPR2024-00951 concerning U.S. Patent No. 10,531,443 covering a physical uplink control channel format for 5G New Radio, petitioners Ericsson Inc. and Nokia of America Corporation, together with patent owner Active Wireless Technologies LLC, filed a joint motion to terminate the inter partes review. The motion cites a confidential settlement agreement between the parties, notes that the Board has not yet decided the merits, and argues that public policy favors termination of settled disputes. No other pending IPRs exist against the patent, and related district court litigation has also been resolved.

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in Ericsson Inc. et al. vs Active Wireless Technologies LLC is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

patentIPR2026-00015

Resonac Hard Disk Corporation et al.vsMR TECHNOLOGIES GMBH

An exhibit summarizing PTAB IPR outcomes shows that all 4,148 trials were instituted, with 20% yielding mixed claim findings under §103, and 24% under §102 for a subset of 1,190 trials.

patentIPR2024-00673

Texas Instruments IncorporatedvsGreenthread, LLC

Texas Instruments challenged the '11121222 patent on multiple grounds of obviousness (§103), arguing that prior art references like Kawagoe, Wieczorek, and Wolf render the semiconductor device claims unpatentable. The PTAB found the merits strong and determined that institution was warranted for review.

patentIPR2025-00242

Precision Cancer Technologies Inc.vsOncoustics Inc.

Precision Cancer Technologies has requested a PTAB Director Review of IPR2025-00242. The Patent Owner, Oncoustics, is limited to a brief response within five days, with no new evidence allowed.

patentIPR2025-00291

Google LLC et al.vsPegasus Wireless Innovation LLC

Google and its affiliates have filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all twelve claims of Pegasus Wireless Innovation's 5G frequency‑hopping patent, arguing that the claims are obvious or anticipated over multiple prior‑art references. The petition also argues the Board should not deny the filing under discretionary statutes.

patentIPR2025-00255

Microsoft Corporation et al.vsX1 Discovery, Inc.

Microsoft has filed an IPR petition challenging all 27 claims of X1 Discovery’s 9,633,139 patent covering incremental multi‑string search. The petition argues the claims are obvious over Lotus Notes, Raskin, Wu and over Entourage, True, and Baeza‑Yates references.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call