Short Summary
Microsoft has filed an IPR petition challenging claims 13‑15, 17‑18 of Dialect’s 9,263,039 patent, asserting they are obvious over prior art from Maes and Ross. The petition argues the examiner never evaluated this combination and that discretionary factors favor institution.
Detailed Summary
In Petition IPR2025‑00657, Microsoft Corporation seeks inter partes review of claims 13‑15, 17‑18 of U.S. Patent No. 9,263,039 owned by Dialect, LLC. The challenger argues that the asserted claims are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §103 as they would have been obvious in view of the combined teachings of U.S. Patent No. 6,964,023 (Maes) and U.S. Publication No. 2002/0133354 (Ross), which disclose similar multimodal speech and non‑speech processing techniques. The petition contends that the examiner never considered this combination during prosecution, constituting a material error, and that discretionary denial factors under §§ 325(d) and 314(a) weigh against denial, supporting institution of the proceeding.
Practitioner Note
This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in Microsoft Corporation et al. vs Dialect, LLC is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.
Related Cases
Texas Instruments IncorporatedvsGreenthread, LLC
The USPTO denied Texas Instruments' request for Director Review of the Final Written Decisions in two IPRs involving a Greenthread patent on power management circuitry.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al.vsHEADWATER PARTNERS II LLC
Samsung and several major carriers settled their inter partes review of Headwater’s wireless patent, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding and keep the settlement terms confidential.
Tesla, Inc.vsIntellectual Ventures II
Tesla has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate Intellectual Ventures’ ’158 patent covering multi‑sensor digital cameras, arguing obviousness over Matsushima, Yu, and Miyazaki and opposing discretionary denial.
Amazon Web Services, Inc. et al.vsZiklag IP LLC
The PTAB granted institution for Amazon Web Services' IPR against Ziklag IP regarding patent 6182128, allowing the review to proceed.
Orca Security Ltd.vsWiz, Inc.
Orca Security and Wiz settled their dispute, leading the PTAB to terminate the inter partes review of patent 11,929,896. The Board accepted the joint motion and kept the settlement agreement confidential.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.
Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.