CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v. UMBRA TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

IPR2024-00344

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. successfully challenged seven claims of UMBRA TECHNOLOGIES LTD.'s patent under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (obviousness). The Board preliminarily found that the claimed invention was obvious over the prior art reference Agarwala and general knowledge of a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art (POSITA).

Jurisdiction
US PTAB
Case Number
IPR2024-00344
Judge(s)
ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, MICHAEL R. ZECHER, GREGG I. ANDERSON
Decision Date
29 January 2024

Detailed Summary

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. initiated an IPR against UMBRA TECHNOLOGIES LTD.'s patent (11146632), challenging claims 1-7 based on obviousness over the prior art reference Agarwala and POSITA knowledge. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success for the Petitioner, instituting the proceeding. A key aspect of the decision involved claim construction, where the Board preliminarily determined that the preamble phrase 'for providing data beacons' should not be treated as limiting because the body of the claim described a structurally complete invention.

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. vs UMBRA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

patentIPR2025-00349

Stingray Group Inc. et al.vsHernandez-Mondragon, Edwin et al.

The PTAB granted institution for the IPR against U.S. Patent 10,123,074, finding a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability based on Avellan. The decision confirmed that 'content provider' does not require originating the request.

patentIPR2024-01126

Nike, Inc.vsSherryWear, LLC

Nike and SherryWear reached a confidential settlement, prompting the PTAB to terminate the IPRs covering SherryWear’s footwear patent (U.S. 10,219,550). The Board cited statutory authority to end the review before any merits were decided.

patentIPR2025-01181

Google LLCvsSecure Communication Technologies, LLC

Google’s IPR against a proximity‑based advertising patent resulted in five of the nine challenged claims being found unpatentable, while the remaining four claims were upheld.

patentPGR2025-00045

Syngenta Crop Protection AGvsInflexion Point Technologies, LLC

Syngenta has filed a Post‑Grant Review petition seeking to invalidate 19 claims of U.S. Patent 12,102,027 covering a prescriptive seed‑treatment method, alleging anticipation, obviousness, and lack of enablement.

patentIPR2025-00448

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al.vsVasu Holdings, LLC

Samsung has filed a petition for Director rehearing, arguing that the PTAB’s discretionary denial of its IPR petitions violates due process and the APA after the USPTO retroactively rescinded the Vidal Memo. The company contends the Board ignored its timely Sotera stipulation, which should have shielded the petitions from denial.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call