MIM Software Inc. et al. v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al.

IPR2025-00725

The PTAB denied MIM Software's request to review claims in Progenics' medical image analysis patent. The denial was based on Petitioner's failure to provide a clear, single claim construction for key terms like 'risk map.'

Jurisdiction
US PTAB
Case Number
IPR2025-00725
Judge(s)
Jameson Lee, Annette R. Reimers, Christopher G. Paulraj
Decision Date
14 March 2025

Detailed Summary

In this Institution Decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board denied the petition filed by MIM Software Inc. against Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., regarding U.S. Patent No. 11,424,035. The denial was not based on the merits of unpatentability but rather on procedural grounds: Petitioner failed to satisfy 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b). By proposing multiple alternative constructions for terms such as 'risk map' and 'risk indices,' without explaining how these differing definitions would affect patentability analysis against the prior art (Maier, Huang), the Petition was deemed procedurally deficient.

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in MIM Software Inc. et al. vs Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call