Google LLC v. 138 East LCD Advancements Limited et al.

IPR2024-00955

Google LLC's IPR petition against a patent covering image processing methods was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that Google failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on unpatentability grounds, specifically regarding obviousness over prior art references like Luo-250.

Jurisdiction
US PTAB
Case Number
IPR2024-00955
Judge(s)
KRISTEN L. DROESCH, GEORGE R. HOSKINS, BRIAN P. MURPHY
Decision Date
21 June 2024

Detailed Summary

The Petitioner, Google LLC, challenged 33 claims of U.S. Patent No. 7668365 B2, which relates to image processing for object detection and picture enhancement. The petition relied primarily on obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103) against various prior art references, including Luo-250. However, the PTAB denied institution because Google failed to adequately explain how the prior art disclosed or rendered obvious key limitations of the challenged claims. Specifically, the Board found insufficient evidence linking Luo-250's probability/belief map system to the claimed functions of 'determining a color range' or acquiring properties of the determined main object image data.

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in Google LLC vs 138 East LCD Advancements Limited et al. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call