Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. Netlist, Inc.

IPR2025-01402

The PTAB held that claims 18‑23, 39‑44, and 56‑60 of Netlist’s ’537 patent are obvious over the Amidi and Klein references, rendering all challenged claims unpatentable.

Jurisdiction
US PTAB
Case Number
IPR2025-01402
Judge(s)
STEPHEN C. SIU, MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS, SHEILA F. McSHANE
Decision Date
25 August 2025

Detailed Summary

In IPR2017-00668, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board reviewed SK Hynix’s challenge to Netlist’s U.S. Patent No. 7,532,537 B2. The petitioner argued that a combination of the Amidi and Klein prior‑art references taught every limitation of the asserted claims, including the selective coupling and isolation features. The patent owner contended that the prior art failed to disclose key claim elements, that the combination would be inoperable, and that undue experimentation would be required. After adopting Federal Circuit claim constructions and evaluating the evidence, the Board concluded that the petitioner had met its burden of proof and found all challenged claims unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §103(a). The Board also denied the petitioner’s motion to exclude the patent owner’s expert testimony.

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. vs Netlist, Inc. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call