Short Summary
Withrow Networks has requested a Director Review of IPR2025-00775. Google, the petitioner, may submit a limited response within five business days, and no new evidence is allowed.
Detailed Summary
In the IPR proceeding IPR2025-00775 concerning U.S. Patent No. 10,771,849, patent owner Withrow Networks Inc. has filed a request for Director Review. The PTAB Director has instructed that Google LLC, the petitioner, may file a response limited to the issues raised in the Director Review request, no longer than 15 pages, and that no new evidence may be submitted. The response must be filed within five business days, after which the Director will decide whether to grant or deny the review.
Practitioner Note
This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in Google LLC et al. vs Withrow Networks Inc. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.
Related Cases
SNAP INC. et al.vsNokia Technologies Oy
Hisense USA Corporation and Nokia Technologies Oy have reached a settlement and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review of Nokia’s U.S. Patent No. 11,805,267. The motion cites statutory authority under 35 U.S.C. § 317 and argues that termination will save resources and promote settlement policy.
US Conec Ltd.vsSenko Advanced Components, Inc.
US Conec Ltd. has filed a Petition challenging 18 claims of Senko Advanced Components' patent, alleging obviousness and anticipation based on prior art references including Nguyen, Lin, Scherer, and Gniadek. The petitioner argues that combining these references yields predictable improvements to the optical connector technology.
Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al.vsStratasys, Inc. et al.
The USPTO Director denied petitions for review of institution decisions in three IPRs challenging Stratasys patents, including U.S. Patent 9,421,713. The denial leaves the institution decisions standing.
Apple Inc.vsImberaTek, LLC
Apple files an IPR seeking to invalidate ImberaTek’s 7,732,909 patent on embedded circuit‑board components, arguing all 33 claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art references.
Canadian Solar (USA) Inc. et al.vsTrina Solar Co. Ltd.
Canadian Solar has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 17 claims of Trina Solar’s 2019 solar‑cell patent, arguing obviousness over multiple prior‑art references including Jin, Feldmann and Chang.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.
Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.