Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v. Stratasys, Inc. et al.

Apotex Inc.vsIpsen Biopharm Ltd. et al.

Apotex has filed an IPR petition challenging all 15 claims of Ipsen’s 2017 pancreatic‑cancer treatment patent, arguing the claims are obvious over a body of prior‑art that teaches the same drug regimen.

Toyota Motor Corporation et al.vsInfogation Corp.

Toyota Motor Corporation et al. filed an opening petition to challenge Infogation Corp.'s patent (US 10107628) in the PTAB, alleging anticipation and obviousness of navigation system claims. The petitioner asserts that prior art, particularly JP973, discloses methods for using artistic maps with coordinate transformation for destination selection.

Rode Microphones, LLC et al.vsZaxcom, Inc.

RØDE Microphones and Freedman Electronics have filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of 11 claims of Zaxcom’s ’207 patent, arguing obviousness over four prior‑art references and invoking collateral estoppel from earlier PTAB decisions.

Google LLCvsSonos, Inc.

Sonos filed a response defending the PTAB Director’s denial to institute Google’s IPR over patent 10,541,883, arguing the Director’s discretion is unreviewable and that procedural requirements were met.

Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al.vsStratasys, Inc. et al.

The PTAB denied institution for IPR2025-00585, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood that any asserted claims were unpatentable. The denial hinged on ambiguity in claim language and lack of teaching in the prior art regarding material property calculations.