Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v. Stratasys, Inc. et al.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsEmpire Technology Development LLC

Empire Technology Development LLC seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s decision that claims 25‑28 of its 8,798,120 patent are unpatentable. The owner argues the Board misapplied the district court’s claim construction and relied on unsupported prior art. Samsung Electronics is the challenger.

Google LLCvsAdvanced Coding Technologies LLC

Google has filed an IPR petition challenging all 12 claims of Advanced Coding Technologies’ 2012 media‑server patent, asserting that the claims are obvious over a suite of prior‑art references.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsSiOnyx, LLC

Samsung and SiOnyx jointly moved to terminate IPR2024‑01431 after reaching a settlement, also requesting the settlement documents be kept confidential.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. et al.vsOAK IP LLC

The PTAB held that Samsung Electronics’ challenge to Acorn Semi’s ’261 patent succeeded, finding all nine challenged claims unpatentable based on anticipation by Grupp ’483 and obviousness over Jammy.

BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.vsOptronic Sciences LLC

BOE Technology Group and Optronic Sciences settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 7,226,801 B2. The Board terminated the proceeding by joint motion, citing good cause and confidentiality considerations.