Apple Inc. v. Smith Interface Technologies, LLC

IPR2024-01083

An email notifies that the PTAB has received a Director Review request in IPR2024-01083 and outlines strict response limits for Apple.

Jurisdiction
US PTAB
Case Number
IPR2024-01083
Decision Date
28 June 2024
Filing Date
28 June 2024

Detailed Summary

The PTAB sent a Director Review Request email to counsel for both parties in IPR2024-01083, indicating that the patent owner’s request for review has been received. Apple, the petitioner, is instructed to submit a concise response limited to the issues raised, no longer than 15 pages, within five business days, and is barred from introducing new evidence. No further briefing is permitted until the Director decides on the review request.

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in Apple Inc. vs Smith Interface Technologies, LLC is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

patentIPR2025-00410

SIG Sauer, Inc.vsLone Star Future Weapons, Inc. et al.

SIG Sauer has filed a petition for inter partes review of U.S. Patent 8,919,238, asserting that the weapon‑system claims are anticipated or obvious over Holek, Rossier, and Chinn. The petition seeks institution of the IPR to cancel all 17 challenged claims.

patentIPR2025-01439

Snap Inc. et al.vsNokia Technologies Oy

Hisense USA Corporation and Nokia Technologies Oy have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 7,532,808 and jointly request the Board to keep the settlement agreement confidential and terminate the proceeding as to Hisense.

patentIPR2025-00805

Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al.vsChampion Power Equipment, Inc.

Harbor Freight has filed an IPR petition challenging Champion Power’s 2019 dual‑fuel engine patent, asserting that all 24 claims are either obvious or anticipated by a suite of prior‑art references. The petition seeks institution of the review and cancellation of the claims.

patentIPR2024-00936

Texas Instruments IncorporatedvsParkerVision, Inc.

Texas Instruments (Petitioner) successfully secured institution of its Inter Partes Review petition against ParkerVision's patent (9118528). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of obviousness over combinations including Tayloe, TI Datasheet, and Macnally.

patentIPR2025-00558

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsAnonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC

Samsung and Anonymous Media Research Holdings jointly moved to terminate IPR2025-00558 before any institution decision, and the Board granted the termination to conserve resources.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call