Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v. DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

Micron Technology, Inc. et al.vsYangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.

Micron Technology initiated an Inter Partes Review against Yangtze Memory Technologies regarding 3D NAND Flash Memory claims. The petitioner argues that the claimed structural elements are obvious over prior art reference Toyama, establishing a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits for IPR institution.

Arthrex, Inc. et al.vsMedshape, Inc.

The PTAB denied Arthrex's IPR petition against Medshape's patent (7985222), citing the complex and overlapping nature of co-pending district court litigation.

Bizlink Technology, Inc., et al.vsAnder Power Products, Inc.

Anderson Power Products seeks director review to overturn the Board’s institution and final written decision that found several claims of its arc‑suppressing connector patent unpatentable over Winkler. The owner argues the petition lacked particularity and the Board’s claim construction of “within” was erroneous.

Therabody, Inc.vsDataFeel, Inc. et al.

Therabody has filed a post‑grant review petition seeking cancellation of DataFeel’s 12,036,174 patent covering percussive massage devices. The petition alleges obviousness over multiple prior‑art references and a lack of written description and enablement. It also argues the Board should not invoke the Fintiv discretionary denial provision.

Medtronic, Inc.vsMoskowitz Family LLC

Medtronic has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate 15 claims of the ’755 spinal implant patent, alleging that the claims are anticipated or obvious over prior art such as Schäfer, Yeh, Berry, and Suddaby. The petition contends the patent owner concealed key references during prosecution.