Short Summary
Visa's claims against Cortex MCP were upheld by the PTAB Director in a review of the Final Written Decision. The Board confirmed that Oborne discloses the token verification limitation central to Visa's patent.
Detailed Summary
In this Delegated Director Review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirmed its Final Written Decision, denying Cortex MCP’s request for reversal. The Panel found no error in the Board's determination that the challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,251,531 B2 were unpatentable over Oborne. Specifically, the Director confirmed that the Board properly evaluated claim construction and did not introduce a new theory of unpatentability, agreeing that Oborne discloses verification through its disclosure of pre-funding or pre-authorizing tokens.
Practitioner Note
This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in Visa, Inc. vs Cortex MCP, Inc. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.
Related Cases
Apple Inc.vsApex Beam Technologies LLC
Apple and Apex Beam Technologies entered a confidential settlement that led to the joint termination of sixteen inter partes review proceedings covering Apex Beam’s patents. The Board granted the joint motion, treating the settlement agreements as confidential.
Alvotech USA Inc. et al.vsRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The PTAB granted institution for the PGR proceeding (PGR2025-00085) involving Alvotech and Regeneron regarding patent 12168036. The petitioner met the likelihood of prevailing standard.
Amazon.com Services LLCvsSmart Speaker LLC
A notice of decisions on institution was issued, denying several IPRs and granting others, while the status of Amazon's IPR against Smart Speaker remains pending.
Google LLCvsClear Imaging Research LLC
Google petitions the PTAB to invalidate Clear Imaging’s 32‑claim video‑stabilization patent, alleging obviousness over four prior‑art references and arguing claim‑term constructions. The petition seeks cancellation of all claims.
Liberty Energy, Inc. et al.vsU.S. Well Services, LLC
Liberty Energy and U.S. Well Services have filed a joint request to keep their settlement confidential and to terminate IPR2025‑00031 concerning a hydraulic fracturing patent.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.
Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.