Tessell, Inc. v. Nutanix, Inc.

PacifiCorp et al.vsMES, Inc.

Petitioners and the patent owner jointly move to have their settlement agreement treated as business confidential information, invoking statutory confidentiality provisions.

Element TV Company, LP et al.vsNokia Technologies Oy

Element TV and Nokia have reached a settlement and jointly request that the Board treat the settlement agreement as confidential, moving to terminate the IPR over Nokia’s video broadcast patent.

Cambridge Mobile Telematics, Inc.vsSfara, Inc.

The PTAB denied institution of IPR for Cambridge Mobile Telematics against Sfara, citing Petitioner's failure to provide a proper claim construction under 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(3). Additionally, the Board found that key 'component' terms functioned as means-plus-function limitations lacking cognizable structure in the patent specification.

Kahoot! AS et al.vsinterstellar inc.

Kahoot! has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of 14 claims of Interstellar’s ’825 patent, arguing that the claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art references and that discretionary denial under the Fintiv factors is inappropriate.

Avanos Medical, Inc.vsStratus Medical, LLC

Avanos Medical filed a Petition challenging Stratus Medical's RF neurotomy needle patent ('782 Patent). The central argument is that the claimed device is obvious because it merely combines conventional features from prior art references like Racz, Fitz, and Lee. This challenges 27 claims related to advanced medical ablation technology.