SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al. v. OMNI MEDSCI, INC.

Apple Inc.vsVaria Holdings LLC

Apple has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate 19 claims of Varia’s RFID‑enabled mobile device patent, asserting obviousness over multiple prior‑art references. The petition argues that the claims lack novelty and meet PTAB discretionary standards for institution.

Hisense USA Corporation et al.vsVideoLabs, Inc.

Hisense has filed an IPR petition challenging eight claims of VideoLabs' ’304 patent, asserting anticipation and obviousness over the Russ and Robert patents.

Google LLCvsTelcom Ventures LLC

Google petitions the PTAB to invalidate Telcom Ventures' 9,832,708 patent covering NFC‑based smartphone payments, asserting obviousness over Barnett, Byrne, and White references.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited et al.vsMarlin Semiconductor Ltd. et al.

TSMC and Apple have filed a petition to invalidate Marlin Semiconductor's FinFET patent, arguing that the claims are obvious in view of multiple prior‑art references. The petition seeks institution of an IPR covering claims 1‑12.

AT&T Enterprises, LLC et al.vsASUS Technology Licensing Inc.

Multiple major carriers, including AT&T and T-Mobile, have filed a Petition challenging ASUS Technology Licensing Inc.'s '868 patent on grounds of obviousness. The petitioners argue that the core concepts related to beam correspondence and higher layer signaling in 5G NR were anticipated or rendered obvious by prior art references Jung and Xiong. This challenge targets several claims relating to advanced wireless communication methods.