Speech recognition and natural language processing — US PTAB Patent Cases
5 decisions indexed
Page 1 of 1 · 5 total
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.Dialect, LLC
Meta Platforms petitions the PTAB to invalidate Dialect’s 9,263,039 patent covering multimodal speech processing, asserting that the claims are obvious over prior patents Maes and Ross.
Microsoft Corporation v.Dialect, LLC
Google LLC’s petition to invalidate Dialect’s 7,398,209 patent on speech‑interface technology was denied. The Board concluded the petitioner did not show a reasonable likelihood of success on any of its obviousness arguments.
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.VB Assets, LLC
Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging VB Assets' U.S. Patent 8,886,536, which covers voice‑based advertising. The petition alleges that 55 claims are obvious over a combination of prior‑art references, invoking 35 U.S.C. §103. The Board has yet to rule.
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.VB Assets, LLC
Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging all 52 claims of VB Assets’ voice‑advertising patent, arguing they are obvious over multiple prior‑art references. The petition cites §§102(b/e) and prior claim constructions to support unpatentability.
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
The PTAB denied Google LLC's request to institute IPR against Dialect LLC's speech-interface patent (8015006). The Board found that Google failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its obviousness grounds.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.