Semiconductor displays — US PTAB Patent Cases
3 decisions indexed
Page 1 of 1 · 3 total
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences LLC
BOE Technology Group opposes Optronic Sciences' request for Director Review, asserting that BOE is the sole real party in interest and that the patent owner's RPI arguments are untimely and unsupported.
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
BOE Technology Group opposes Optronic Sciences' request for Director Review, asserting that Beijing Electronics Holdings is not a real party in interest and that the patent owner delayed raising RPI issues. The Board’s prior rulings supporting BOE’s RPI identification are reaffirmed, and the Director Review request is urged to be denied.
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
BOE Technology Group opposes Optronic Sciences' Director Review request, asserting it is the only real party in interest and that BEH lacks control. The petition highlights PO's untimely filing and new arguments, seeking denial of the request.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.