Industry Sector
Personal Care Appliances — US PTAB Patent Cases
2 decisions indexed
Page 1 of 1 · 2 total
patent denied
SharkNinja, Inc. et al. v.Dyson Technology Limited
· IPR2024-00993
SharkNinja's IPR challenge against Dyson regarding hair styling attachments was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on any challenged claim based on obviousness over prior art references.
patent null
SharkNinja, Inc. et al. v.Dyson Technology Limited
· IPR2024-00993
SharkNinja filed an IPR petition challenging Dyson's patent (11044979) on grounds of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner argues that the claimed hot air styling methods are predictable combinations of prior art, specifically combining Saito and Lindsey references.
Arctic Invent — IP Strategy
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.