Optics — US PTAB Patent Cases
3 decisions indexed
Page 1 of 1 · 3 total
Luxottica of America Inc. et al. v.E-Vision Optics, LLC
Luxottica of America Inc. filed a petition challenging E-Vision Optics' patent claims related to smart eyewear, asserting that the patents are invalid due to obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner argues that known components and predictable arrangements disclosed in prior art references render nearly all claims unpatentable.
Cambridge Industries USA Inc. et al. v.Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Cambridge Industries against Applied Optoelectronics over a patent covering optical isolator arrays, focusing on anticipation and obviousness grounds.
Coretronic Corporation et al. v.Maxell, LTD.
The Director denied institution of the IPR against Maxell's patent 7159988, citing settled expectations and potential duplication with a parallel district court case.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.