Intellectual property — US PTAB Patent Cases
5 decisions indexed
Page 1 of 1 · 5 total
Microsoft Corporation v.Dialect, LLC
A statistical study of 2021 IPR final written decisions shows that patents deemed unpatentable typically have extensive prior‑art citations and often rely on new prior art and expert testimony introduced during the proceeding.
Microsoft Corporation v.Dialect, LLC
A 2024 study of PTAB final written decisions from 2021 shows that patents invalidated in IPRs often have extensive prior‑art citations and that most unpatentability grounds depend on new prior art introduced during the proceeding, with expert testimony frequently influencing outcomes.
Google LLC v.VirtaMove, Corp.
Google seeks a rehearing of the PTAB Director’s decision denying institution of an IPR against VirtaMove’s 14‑year‑old patent, arguing the Director exceeded statutory authority and misapplied a "settled expectations" doctrine.
Docker Inc. v.Intellectual Ventures II LLC
The USPTO Board denied the institution of IPR2025-00840, favoring Intellectual Ventures II LLC's request for discretionary denial. The decision cited parallel district court and IPR proceedings as reasons to conserve resources.
Arm Ltd et al. v.DAEDALUS PRIME LLC
The Director granted review and vacated a denial of institution for Arm Ltd against DAEDALUS PRIME LLC, referring the IPR back to the Board after parallel litigation was dismissed.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.