Electronic packaging — US PTAB Patent Cases
8 decisions indexed
Page 1 of 1 · 8 total
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
Apple has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate ImberaTek’s ’201 patent on embedding components in a baseboard, asserting that the claim is anticipated or obvious over six prior‑art references. The petition argues that the Board should not deny institution and that all Fintiv factors favor proceeding.
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
Apple and ImberaTek have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,071,207 and jointly filed a motion to terminate the pending IPR. The Board is asked to dismiss the pre‑institution proceeding on good‑cause grounds.
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
Apple files an IPR seeking to invalidate ImberaTek's 9,107,324 patent on circuit modules, asserting anticipation and obviousness over multiple prior‑art references.
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
Apple has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 14 claims of ImberaTek’s ’816 patent, arguing they are obvious over prior‑art packaging references. The petition requests institution and cancellation of the claims.
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
Apple files an IPR seeking to invalidate ImberaTek’s 7,732,909 patent on embedded circuit‑board components, arguing all 33 claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art references.
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
Apple petitions an IPR to invalidate 36 claims of ImberaTek's 7,989,944 patent covering embedded components in circuit boards, asserting obviousness over multiple prior‑art references.
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
Apple has filed an IPR petition challenging all 33 claims of ImberaTek’s 2010 patent on embedded circuit‑board components, asserting obviousness over multiple prior‑art references.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.--
Samsung Electronics petitions the PTAB to invalidate TopWire's 9,859,202 PoP patent, asserting that all claim limitations are anticipated or obvious over earlier packaging references such as Sun and Chen. The petition includes detailed claim constructions and requests cancellation of the challenged claims.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.