Display technologies — US PTAB Patent Cases
5 decisions indexed
Page 1 of 1 · 5 total
Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.LG Display Co., Ltd.
LG Display submits a preliminary response urging the PTAB to deny Tianma’s IPR petition, arguing that the prior‑art does not render any of the 19 claims obvious and that the petitioner’s claim constructions are inconsistent.
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Paneltouch Technologies LLC
BOE Technology and Paneltouch Technologies have settled IPR2025-01245. The parties filed a joint motion to keep the settlement agreement confidential and separate from the public docket.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al. v.Sinotechnix LLC
Samsung and Sinotechnix have settled their OLED display patent dispute and jointly moved to terminate the IPR, requesting the settlement be kept confidential.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.SiOnyx, LLC
Samsung and SiOnyx have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,905,599 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review, requesting the settlement be kept confidential.
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
BOE Technology has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of claims 1 and 3 of Optronic Sciences’ OLED pixel patent, arguing obviousness over Anzai and its combination with Yamazaki and Yamada. The petition also argues that discretionary denial is not warranted.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.