Digital video streaming — US PTAB Patent Cases
4 decisions indexed
Page 1 of 1 · 4 total
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.DivX, LLC
Amazon has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of DivX’s 10,412,141 patent covering progressive video playback. The petition asserts that all 30 claims are obvious over a combination of prior‑art references (Hagai, Li, Park, Schmitz) and general POSITA knowledge.
Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC v.Adeia Media Holdings Inc.
Disney has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate 17 claims of a video‑streaming patent, arguing obviousness over prior art references Mao, Liu, Sherer and Wu‑771.
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
TikTok has filed an IPR petition challenging all 20 claims of NTECH's video‑recommendation patent, asserting that the invention is obvious over earlier systems such as Marcus156 and Harbick.
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
TikTok has filed an IPR petition challenging NTECH’s U.S. Pat. 8,875,185, asserting that the claims are obvious over a suite of prior‑art video‑programming references. The petition seeks institution and argues that discretionary denial is unwarranted.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.