Dental orthodontics — US PTAB Patent Cases
4 decisions indexed
Page 1 of 1 · 4 total
ClearCorrect Operating, LLC et al. v.Align Technology, Inc.
Align Technology requests a Director Review to vacate the institution of IPR2025‑00820, arguing that the district court trial date now precedes the final written decision deadline, that the petition merely repeats prior‑art already considered, and that the petitioner failed to disclose all real parties in interest.
ClearCorrect Operating, LLC et al. v.Align Technology, Inc.
ClearCorrect seeks Director review to overturn the Board’s institution of an IPR over Align Technology’s orthodontic aligner patent, arguing changed Fintiv factors, improper obvious‑to‑try reasoning, and undisclosed foreign parties.
ClearCorrect Operating, LLC et al. v.Align Technology, Inc.
The USPTO Director denied ClearCorrect's petitions for review of institution decisions in five IPRs involving Align Technology patents, leaving the institution rulings intact.
ClearCorrect Operating, LLC et al. v.Align Technology, Inc.
ClearCorrect has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑20 of Align Technology’s orthodontic treatment‑planning patent, arguing the claims are obvious over four prior‑art references.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.