Cooling systems — US PTAB Patent Cases
3 decisions indexed
Page 1 of 1 · 3 total
Vertiv Corporation v.Valtrus Innovations Ltd.
Vertiv has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all nine claims of Valtrus’s 2005 cooling‑system patent, asserting anticipation and obviousness over multiple prior‑art references and urging the Board to institute the trial.
Green Revolution Cooling, Inc. v.Midas Green Technologies, LLC
The Director denied the institution of an IPR for Midas Green Technologies against Green Revolution Cooling, citing Fintiv factors and concerns over parallel proceedings.
Green Revolution Cooling, Inc. v.Midas Green Technologies, LLC
Green Revolution Cooling, Inc. successfully secured institution at the PTAB against Midas Green Technologies, LLC regarding claims covering appliance immersion cooling systems. The Board found that the petitioner met the burden of proof for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based on prior art references Best-2008 and Osada.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.