Industry Sector

Cloud computing — US PTAB Patent Cases

13 decisions indexed

Page 1 of 1 · 13 total

patent · Jan 14, 2026

Microsoft Corporation v.Qomplx LLC

· IPR2026-00183

Microsoft has filed an IPR petition challenging claims 1 and 4 of Qomplx’s 2022 cloud‑telemetry patent, asserting obviousness over prior‑art references describing virtual appliances and cloud agents. The petition seeks institution of the review.

patent · Oct 31, 2025

Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC v.Adeia Media Holdings Inc.

· IPR2026-00051

Disney has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 13 claims of U.S. Patent 8,280,987, alleging obviousness over CDN‑related prior art (Dilley, Russell) combined with Menon. The petition includes detailed claim‑construction arguments for key terms.

patent · Oct 31, 2025

Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC v.Adeia Media Holdings Inc.

· IPR2026-00051

Disney has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of claims 1‑13 of Adeia’s U.S. Patent 8,280,987, alleging obviousness over prior‑art CDN patents Dilley, Russell, and Menon. The petition includes detailed claim‑by‑claim mappings and proposed claim constructions.

patent instituted · Apr 6, 2025

Orca Security Ltd. v.Wiz, Inc.

· IPR2025-01084

Orca Security Ltd. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute IPR on all 29 claims of Wiz, Inc.'s patent based on obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The Board found that a combination of Ross, Agarwal, and Biran teaches every limitation of Claim 1, establishing a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability.

patent denied · Mar 20, 2025

Tessell, Inc. v.Nutanix, Inc.

· IPR2025-00732

Nutanix successfully defended the Director’s denial of institution in an IPR against Tessell, arguing that the statute grants no right to institution and that the Director acted within discretionary authority.

patent · Mar 20, 2025

Tessell, Inc. v.Nutanix, Inc.

· IPR2025-00732

Tessell, Inc. has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of claims 1‑19 of Nutanix’s U.S. Patent No. 10,817,157, arguing that the claimed database‑provisioning UI is obvious over known prior art. The petition also argues there is no basis for discretionary denial, urging the Board to institute review.

patent · Jan 31, 2025

Google LLC v.VirtaMove, Corp.

· IPR2025-00488

Google has filed a petition for rehearing, challenging the USPTO Director’s discretionary denial of institution for an IPR against VirtaMove’s cloud‑migration patent. The petition asserts the Director exceeded statutory authority and misapplied a "settled expectations" doctrine.

patent · Dec 23, 2024

Twitch Interactive, Inc. et al. v.Razdog Holdings LLC

· IPR2025-00307

Twitch Interactive has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 18 claims of RazDog’s cloud‑based content‑aggregation patent, arguing obviousness over Darnell, Kim, and Dasgupta references. The petition stresses favorable discretionary factors for institution.

patent · Dec 23, 2024

Twitch Interactive, Inc. et al. v.Razdog Holdings LLC

· IPR2025-00308

Twitch Interactive has filed a petition to invalidate claim 1 of Razdog’s cloud‑computing patent, arguing obviousness over three prior‑art references and seeking institution of an IPR trial.

patent · Dec 13, 2024

Tessell, Inc. v.Nutanix, Inc.

· IPR2025-00298

Nutanix filed a request for director review, urging the PTAB to deny Tessell’s IPR on grounds of unfair dealing, settled expectations, and prior art already examined. The petition argues that the inventors are attempting to profit twice from the same invention.

patent denied · Dec 13, 2024

Tessell, Inc. v.Nutanix, Inc.

· IPR2025-00298

Nutanix successfully defended the Director’s denial of institution in an IPR against Tessell, arguing that the Director’s discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) is unbounded and that no right to institution exists. The Board denied Tessell’s request for rehearing.

patent denied · Dec 13, 2024

Tessell, Inc. v.Nutanix, Inc.

· IPR2025-00298

The PTAB denied Tessell, Inc.'s petition for rehearing of the Director Review order that had vacated the institution of an IPR against Nutanix, Inc.'s patent 11,860,818. The decision leaves the prior order in place and no claims were examined.

patent · Oct 24, 2024

Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.B.S.D. Crown, Ltd.

· IPR2025-00057

Amazon has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of 22 claims of the ’887 patent, arguing they are obvious over a suite of prior‑art references covering mobile‑device virtualization and remote desktop technologies.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →